Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
2025 Crypto Rich List: 12 Big Winners, Who Bet on the Money Maker?
Original Title: The top 12 crypto winners of 2025: who got it right this year?
Original Author: Oluwapelumi Adejumo, CryptoSlate
Original Translation: Saoirse, Foresight News
If 2024 was the year of crypto's 'recovery,' then 2025 was the year the industry's 'infrastructure finally got its due.'
This year, the nascent industry started with cautious optimism in January and ended with explicit federal regulatory support by December.
The result was a complete shift in the industry narrative from 'cryptocurrency equals a casino' to 'cryptocurrency is capital market infrastructure.'
During this time, volume moved on-chain, policymaking entered the White House's purview, and major asset management firms no longer hesitated—Vanguard's earlier stance shift this month being the clearest proof yet, allowing cryptocurrency ETFs on its platform.
Yet, in this year, despite record funding inflows and legislative victories, rewards were not evenly distributed among all participants.
The winners of 2025 were not just the assets that saw price rallies but also protocols, personalities, and products that have solidified their positions in the future financial landscape.
Based on CryptoSlate's analysis, here are the 12 clear winners of the year and their significance:
1. The United States and the Trump Administration
Discussing the 2025 cryptocurrency landscape is incomplete without acknowledging the profound impact of the U.S. stance shift. For years, the cryptocurrency industry had been in a state of 'ready to exit,' viewing Dubai or Singapore as potential safe havens.
However, in 2025, the U.S. closed this 'exit door' entirely, with all industry participants embracing this change. Therefore, this victory belongs to both the U.S. jurisdiction and the top-level power players driving this transformation.
In less than 12 months, the government led by the 47th U.S. President, Donald Trump, achieved many long-standing demands of the cryptocurrency industry, effectively 'pulling back the digital asset economy' to the homeland.
A series of executive orders supporting multiple digital assets has set the tone, with its strategic victories reflected in specific strategies:
The "GENIUS Act," signed on July 18, provided a federal-level definition for stablecoins for the first time;
The "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" executive order released in March sent a clear signal to global sovereign wealth funds — digital assets have become a critical issue at the national security level.
Critically, by driving leadership changes at the U.S. SEC and CFTC, the Trump administration dispelled the fog of "regulation through enforcement."
Essentially, Trump's series of actions laid the groundwork for the U.S. to "become the global cryptocurrency center."
2026 Outlook: Consolidation of U.S. Hegemony
It is expected that the U.S. will actively promote its newly established industry standards. In addition, an executive order that took effect on January 1 also expressly prohibits the issuance of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), clearing the way for private sector innovation: the future dollar will still move towards digitization, but the issuers will be Tether, Circle, various banks, rather than the Federal Reserve.
2. U.S. Spot ETF
(Represented by IBIT, including ETH, SOL, XRP ETF camps)
As the primary tool for institutions to enter the cryptocurrency market, cryptocurrency spot ETFs not only "passed the second-year survival period" in 2025 but also thrived even in the case of poor Bitcoin performance.
BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust Fund (IBIT) became one of the top ten ETFs in terms of inflows in the U.S., with its inflow volume even surpassing traditional giants such as the Invesco QQQ Trust and the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD), providing the most direct evidence.
IBIT Cumulative Net Inflows (Source: SoSo Value)
In addition to Bitcoin, Ethereum spot ETF also solidified its position, becoming the "default entry channel" for wealth management institutions — making debates like "not your keys, not your assets" irrelevant among institutional investors.
September was a key turning point: the SEC approved the "Generic Listing Standards." This technical but crucial policy victory significantly streamlines the approval process for future products, no longer requiring a separate 19b-4 filing for each new code.
Subsequently, the market saw a plethora of new products focusing on other digital assets (such as Solana, XRP), all of which have also seen strong performance this year.
2026 Outlook: Product Diversification and Risk Reduction
With Vanguard Group opening the cryptocurrency ETF channel on December 1, a large number of "basket of assets ETFs" and "covered call options ETFs" are expected to emerge. A more robust options market will begin to lower realized volatility, ultimately making cryptocurrency as an asset class acceptable to conservative pension funds.
3. Solana (SOL)
In 2025, Solana completely shed the label of "high-risk beta asset," and the old narrative of "fast but buggy" is now history.
Meanwhile, Solana has also completed the most challenging transformation in the cryptocurrency industry this year: transitioning from a "Meme coin casino" to a "global market liquidity layer."
While maintaining its dominance in the cultural sector, CoinGecko data shows that Solana has been the world's most-watched blockchain ecosystem for two consecutive years (2024-2025).
The current Solana network is no longer only revolving around speculative tokens but has become a "hub of efficient capital."
According to Artemis data, Solana has become a core liquidity layer: its on-chain SOL-USD trading volume has exceeded the sum of SOL spot trading volumes on Binance and Bybit (two of the world's top three centralized exchanges by trading volume) for three consecutive months.
Solana's on-chain trading volume surpasses the spot trading volume on Binance and Bybit (Source: Artemis)
Essentially, Solana has positioned itself as the "primary venue for activities sensitive to transaction execution speed." Its competitors are no longer just Ethereum, but traditional financial market platforms like Nasdaq.
2026 Outlook: On-chain Price Discovery Goes Mainstream
This level of trading volume's "on-chain shift" marks a structural transformation: price discovery is shifting from centralized exchanges to on-chain. In 2026, Solana will no longer be a "high-risk beta network" but the primary venue for high-frequency, stablecoin-denominated trading.
4. Ethereum Layer 2 Network Base
If Solana's strength lies in "speed," then Coinbase's Ethereum Layer 2 network Base stands out due to its "user engagement capability."
By leveraging the vast existing user base of this American exchange platform, Base has become the "default choice for consumer apps and stablecoin experiments," with extremely high user stickiness.
Base's success proves that in the cryptocurrency industry of 2025, "user engagement" is more important than "novel encryption technology." It has become an "incubator for mainstream crypto applications" — these consumer fintech apps use cryptocurrency infrastructure on the backend, but users are completely unaware of this fact. It could be said that Base is the bridge connecting the chaotic on-chain world with Coinbase's compliant security system.
2026 Outlook: The Rise of "Wallet-native Business"
It is expected that Base will become the "core engine" for Coinbase's foray into the merchant payment field next year, and "wallet-native business" (business activities based on crypto wallets) may become a new industry trend.
5. Ripple and XRP
After years of legal troubles, 2025 finally became the year of Ripple and XRP's "regained freedom."
The long-standing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC finally came to an end with a final judgment, clearing the way for institutional adoption of XRP.
The result was that XRP's narrative transformed overnight from a "litigation-risk asset" to a "liquidity engine," driving its price up and paving the way for the launch of the first XRP spot ETF in November.
XRP Exchange-Traded Fund Daily Fund Flow (Source: SoSo Value)
Meanwhile, Ripple Inc. made significant acquisitions of traditional financial infrastructure this year: in just one year in 2025, Ripple invested over $4 billion in strategic acquisitions, the most notable of which included the acquisitions of the bulk broker Hidden Road, the asset management company GTreasury, and the stablecoin infrastructure provider Rail.
These moves effectively transform Ripple from a "payment company" into a "full-stack institutional giant."
2026 Outlook: Integrating Traditional Finance with the Crypto Ecosystem
The "ETF-ication" of XRP is just the beginning. With legal risks dissipating and Wall Street products landing, 2026 will be the "year of integration": Ripple's newly acquired asset management and brokerage business division is expected to start cross-promoting the RLUSD stablecoin to Fortune 500 companies, ultimately breaking down barriers between the Ripple ledger and corporate balance sheets.
6. Zcash and the Privacy Coin Space
The resurgence of Zcash and the entire privacy coin space was the most surprising "comeback story" of the 2025 cryptocurrency industry.
As the best-performing sector of 2025, privacy coins shed the stigma of "illicit use" and became darlings of the "post-surveillance economy era."
2025 Privacy Coin Performance (Source: Artemis)
While Zcash led this revival, the momentum covered the entire privacy coin space: Ethereum developers accelerated privacy-related initiatives, and other privacy solutions finally saw real-world applications.
Furthermore, the "thawing" of the regulatory environment was evident—SEC held its first official meeting with privacy protocol leads to discuss the establishment of compliance frameworks. Remember, this was entirely unimaginable a year ago.
2026 Outlook: Emergence of "Privacy DeFi"
The privacy coin space is expected to see "differentiation" in 2026: privacy will become a "premium feature" for compliant institutions. Wall Street will actively adopt these "selective disclosure tools" to prevent MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) frontrunning and safeguard the confidentiality of proprietary trading strategies.
7. Asset Tokenization (RWAs)
With strong support from a SEC-friendly attitude, Real-World Assets (RWAs) transitioned from "pilot projects" to the "core infrastructure" of the cryptocurrency industry.
The SEC no longer takes a hostile enforcement stance, allowing large institutions to confidently integrate these assets without fear of receiving a "Wells Notice" (SEC's precursor to enforcement investigations).
The BlackRock BUIDL Fund has been accepted by Binance as "off-chain collateral," marking a watershed event in the space — blurring the lines between Traditional Finance (TradFi) and the cryptocurrency market structure.
By December, the Asset Under Management (AUM) of tokenized money market funds and U.S. Treasuries had exceeded $8 billion, while the total Real World Asset (RWA) market size was about $20 billion.
RWA Assets (Source: RWA.xyz)
Moreover, traditional financial giants such as BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase, Fidelity, Nasdaq, and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) are all optimistic about the RWA space, hoping to enhance transparency and efficiency in the traditional finance industry through it.
As SEC Chairman Paul Atkins put it, "The on-chain market will bring greater predictability, transparency, and efficiency to investors."
Outlook for 2026: Efficiency Gains in "Repo-Like" Transactions
As large banks like JPMorgan Chase and BNY Mellon continue to integrate RWA assets, a 24/7 collateral market is expected to gradually form, driving the asset management scale in this space towards $18 billion.
8. Stablecoins
The debate over the "cryptocurrency killer app" has settled: Stablecoins are the core infrastructure. In October 2025, the total market capitalization of stablecoins exceeded $300 billion; in September, the supply of stablecoins in the Ethereum ecosystem also hit a record high of $166 billion.
In fact, data from Token Terminal shows that the total number of stablecoin holders has reached a historical peak of about 200 million.
Stablecoin Holders (Source: Token Terminal)
This data indicates that the growth in the stablecoin space is driven by its core ability of "cross-border, 24/7, instant settlement."
Meanwhile, legislative progress in the United States, especially the passage of the "GENIUS Act," has provided legal certainty for banks to enter the stablecoin space.
Essentially, stablecoins are no longer just a "trading chip" but are evolving into a global financial technology "settlement layer." As Open Eden founder Jeremy NG puts it: "Stablecoins have transitioned from a cryptocurrency 'infrastructure accessory' to a 'financial infrastructure core.'"
2026 Outlook: Growth Driven by Yield
It is expected that "programmatic treasury investing" and "forex use cases" will be core drivers of stablecoin growth, with the total stablecoin market cap projected to reach a baseline level of $380 billion in 2026.
9. Perp DEXs
On-chain derivatives broke through the "credibility bottleneck" in 2025 — with monthly trading volumes hitting a record $12 trillion in October.
What has allowed this sector to emerge as a winner is its successful attraction of significant trading volume from centralized exchanges (CEXs): by offering "self-custody" features and more attractive incentive mechanisms, on-chain perpetual contract trading platforms have gained traders' favor.
Decentralized perpetual contract exchange trading volume rising (Source: DeFiLlama)
The rise of on-chain perpetual contract decentralized exchanges (Perp DEXs) like Hyperliquid and Aster marks the maturation of the DeFi market structure. Today, traders are willing to take on smart contract risks amounting to billions of dollars in order to mitigate counterparty risks.
2026 Outlook: Intensified Fee Competition
On-chain open interest (OI) is becoming a legitimate macro risk indicator. However, the sector may witness fierce "fee wars" in 2026 — where protocols will engage in intense competition to capture a share of this $12 trillion monthly trading volume.
10. Prediction Markets
2025 was the year "event contracts" (the core product of prediction markets) entered the mainstream U.S. market: the two leading platforms in this sector, Kalshi and Polymarket, both saw record-level trading volumes.
But the most notable victory is that several traditional financial institutions and native crypto companies like Gemini and Coinbase have also joined the fray in this emerging field.
Weekly Trading Volume Prediction Market (Source: Dune Analytics)
The prediction market has emerged as a winner because it bridges the gap between 'gambling' and 'finance.' Furthermore, Polymarket has obtained a clear development path through a framework revised by the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), transforming 'event contracts' from 'niche internet curiosities' into 'compliant hedging tools.'
2026 Outlook: Standardization and Scaling
Event contracts are becoming a standardized asset class. With 'outcome economics' (financial activities around event outcomes) expected to reach a scale of $600 billion in nominal value, crypto wallet infrastructure and USDC liquidity are poised for significant growth.
11. Hong Kong, China
While the United States focuses on legislation, Hong Kong, China has shifted its focus to 'execution advantage'—a fact supported by data. In the third quarter of 2025, Hong Kong's ETP (Exchange-Traded Products) market surpassed South Korea and Japan in terms of trading volume, becoming the world's third-largest ETP market with a daily average turnover of 37.8 billion HKD, a 150% year-on-year increase.
Hong Kong's strategy of 'attracting industry through clear regulation' has yielded tangible results in the exchange platform sector: the Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) regime has evolved from a vague 'presumed licensed' state to a sound ecosystem.
By mid-2025, the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) had issued formal licenses to more global major exchange platforms, bringing the total number of licensed trading platforms to 11. This measure effectively integrates institutional liquidity within the region into a system that is 'compliant and connected to banking,' while isolating unregulated participants.
Simultaneously, the 'Stablecoin Ordinance' that took effect in Hong Kong on August 1st has created a 'high-quality sandbox'—as of the September application deadline, the sandbox had attracted over 30 applications.
2026 Outlook: Becoming Asia's Settlement Hub
With the first batch of stablecoin licenses expected to be issued in early 2026, Hong Kong is poised to become Asia's cryptocurrency settlement hub. By combining the 'world's top three ETP market' with 'licensed stablecoin infrastructure,' Hong Kong has successfully positioned itself as the 'key gateway for institutional liquidity in the Asia-Pacific region.'
12. Early Adopter (Crypto Investor)
The final spot on this list belongs to the "hodlers" — the early adopters of cryptocurrency.
Throughout the challenging years, early adopters have continuously heard the narrative that "cryptocurrency is a scam, a bubble, or a dead end." They experienced the industry crash of 2022, the regulatory crackdown of the Gensler era, and the industry lull of 2024. However, in 2025, their perseverance was finally vindicated. (Gensler era: referring to Gary Gensler's term as Chair of the U.S. SEC)
The significance of this year lies not only in the "asset price appreciation" but also in the "validation of core beliefs."
As a result, these early adopters successfully "ran ahead of the world's most renowned institutions." When BlackRock, Vanguard, and sovereign wealth funds dove into the cryptocurrency market this year, the assets they purchased were precisely those held by these early adopters during the industry's darkest days, based on unwavering conviction.
2026 Outlook: Transitioning from Investors to "Eco-Bankers"
As this cohort achieves "intergenerational wealth accumulation," they are not exiting the crypto ecosystem but are instead becoming the "bankers" of the ecosystem. It is expected that this group will become the primary liquidity providers (LPs) of the new decentralized capital markets, supporting the next wave of innovation that traditional banks have yet to grasp.
You may also like
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App