Buy Crypto- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Crypto Sentiment Holds ‘Extreme Fear’ For 14th Straight Day
Key Takeaways
- Crypto market sentiment remained in “extreme fear” for two consecutive weeks, a period longer than seen during FTX’s 2022 crash.
- Bitcoin’s price hovers nearly 30% below its all-time high, despite the Crypto Fear & Greed Index reaching new lows.
- Crypto search volumes on platforms like Google and Wikipedia have significantly declined, indicating waning retail interest.
- Traditional finance investors are still engaging with the crypto market, as reflected by the increase in crypto-related ETF inflows.
- Economists and analysts attribute market fear to geopolitical tensions, potential interest rate changes, and previous market fiascoes.
WEEX Crypto News, 2025-12-26 10:17:13
In the world of cryptocurrencies, market sentiment can be as volatile as the assets themselves. Recently, this sentiment has been overwhelmingly negative, as the Crypto Fear & Greed Index plummeted to distressing levels of “extreme fear.” For 14 straight days, the index has depicted a grim picture of the crypto market’s collective psyche. This period marks one of the longest streaks of fear since the index’s inception in 2018.
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index, a tool used to gauge market sentiment, has fallen to a mere 20 out of 100. This score is notably lower than during the infamous FTX collapse in late 2022, a time when confidence in the crypto sector was severely tested. Yet, despite Bitcoin’s trading value being approximately five times what it was back then, the market’s pulse is almost eerily pessimistic. Such an unrelenting streak of apprehension amplifies questions about what drives the market mood beyond mere valuation metrics.
Factors Fueling the Fear: Economic Concerns and Past Traumas
Several factors have contributed to this stark plunge into fear territory. Firstly, the economic backdrop remains fraught with uncertainties. The US-China tariff tensions, which flared up in early October, played a substantial role in dragging down the market. This geopolitical strife erased nearly $500 billion in value, shaking investor confidence to its core. Further exacerbating these conditions are speculations concerning the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy. Jeff Mei, the COO of crypto exchange BTSE, has cautioned that the cessation of rate cuts by the Fed in the first quarter of 2026 could see Bitcoin’s price dwindle to $70,000.
As of now, Bitcoin’s price hovers around $88,650, a stark departure from its lofty peak of $126,080 reached in early October. While the $88,650 mark dwarfs its nadir in the wake of the 2022 FTX debacle, the repetitive reminders of market volatility have instilled a lingering sense of trepidation. The index’s methodology, which factors in market volatility, trading volume, social media sentiment, trends, and Bitcoin’s market dominance, illustrates that confidence has not fully recovered since FTX’s downfall.
The Decline of Crypto Enthusiasm: Search Volumes Tell a Tale
Beyond valuation metrics, the downturn in market sentiment finds reflection in diminished search volumes on platforms such as Google and Wikipedia. Alphractal, a prominent data analytics platform, has highlighted a stark decline in crypto-related searches, signaling that retail investors are pulling away. This decline in social volume is reminiscent of conditions seen during prolonged bear markets, suggesting that December 2025 embodies such a period of investor apathy.
Retail investors’ disengagement is further highlighted by the absence of robust online discussions. In an industry that thrives on communities and collective enthusiasm, the quiet across forums is loud. Retail investors, battered by past incidents including the abrupt FTX collapse, the turbulence of the memecoin debacle, and the unfulfilled promises of altcoin breakouts, appear to be retreating.
Bitwise Insights: Traditional Finance Investors Surging Ahead
Despite the retreat of “crypto-native retail” participants, there exists an interesting dichotomy in investment patterns. Bitwise’s Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan sheds light on this phenomenon, pointing out that “crypto-native retail” is disenchanted and sidelined. Contrastingly, traditional finance (TradFi) investors are exhibiting a sustained interest in the crypto world.
According to Hougan, TradFi investors, like his own family members, show a growing interest in crypto assets. Over the last couple of years, spot crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) inflows have experienced a significant uptick. In the face of a general market decline, these ETFs have accumulated over $25 billion in inflows throughout 2025, showing a 5% loss in value year-to-date. Such numbers demonstrate that while one section of the investing populace retreats, another sees opportunity—a testament to the complex dynamics within the crypto ecosystem.
The Past as a Precursor: Understanding Current Sentiment
The crypto market’s current state cannot be fully grasped without reflecting on past traumas. The FTX incident still looms large in the collective investor memory. In the tumultuous wake of its collapse, Bitcoin’s value plummeted to around $16,000, hurting many who had hoped for a prosperous future. The market’s recovery was slow, and just as confidence began to rebuild, renewed economic tensions rattled investors once more.
The memecoin craze of past years, though initially profitable for some, ended up hurting a large segment of retail investors. The association of crypto projects with quick, volatile gains resulted in disillusionment when the expected altcoin season failed to materialize. The liquidation event on October 10 further exacerbated the market’s tumult, leaving investors shell-shocked and skeptical.
The Ever-Persistent Search for Stability
For the crypto market to evolve from its current state of “extreme fear,” several factors must align. A de-escalation of global economic tensions, particularly US-China relations, could renew investor confidence. Additionally, clear policy signals from central banks would provide much-needed ground for financial maneuvers, allowing traders to strategize with confidence rather than react out of fear.
Institutional confidence, too, hinges on structural advancements within the market. Ensuring the security and transparency of crypto exchanges, illustrated, for instance, by the tumult surrounding FTX, will play a crucial role. Reinforcing investor protection through regulations and robust security measures can not only prevent future debacles but also assure stakeholders of the market’s integrity and viability.
Yet, even amidst these uncertainties and challenges, certain elements of the crypto industry exhibit resilience. Innovative products and ideas continue to flow, ensuring that interest from institutional players and spot ETFs does not wan. This balancing act between fear and hope defines the current crypto landscape.
Bridging the Divide: A Future Outlook
As the crypto market wades through its current state of stagnation, a reshaped investor landscape is emerging. The rise of TradFi investors into the crypto arena presents both a challenge and an opportunity. It challenges the existing paradigms, as traditional strategies and expectations are brought into an arena accustomed to high volatility and rapid change.
At the same time, it presents an opportunity to further legitimize and stabilize the cryptocurrency market. Increased participation from traditional investors, who often seek more reliable financial instruments, can encourage a maturation of crypto-related products and trading practices. As more traditional investors, like ETFs, stake their claim, they inevitably bring with them standards that could spur greater industry-wide reforms.
But as always, the defining characteristics of the crypto industry—its decentralization, innovation, and risk—will continue to be its bedrock. The path forward involves harmonizing these elements with evolving economic realities to offer a robust value proposition.
Conclusion: The Dance Between Fear and Potential
While unwavering fear seems to grip the crypto market today, it is but one side of the story. As investor sentiment ebbs and flows, so too does the market’s potential. Economists underline that these cycles are natural, and it takes a multitude of strategies to navigate through them effectively. Whether it is through more strategic stakeholder engagement, economic stability, or enhanced product offerings, steps can be taken to reassure and reinvigorate the market.
Ultimately, the cryptocurrency sector persists in its dual promise of risk and reward. With an ever-increasing global footprint and dynamic growth prospects, the promise of greater financial inclusion remains deeply alluring. By tackling prevailing fears with innovation and rational investment strategies, the crypto industry can continue to chart new growth stories beyond the horizon of today’s uncertainties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Crypto Fear & Greed Index?
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is a metric that measures the overall sentiment of the cryptocurrency market, based on factors like market volatility, trading volume, and social media sentiment.
How did the US-China tariff tensions affect the crypto market?
The US-China tariff tensions sparked fears of global economic instability, leading to a substantial decrease in market value, wiping out nearly $500 billion from the crypto market.
Why are traditional finance investors moving into crypto?
Traditional finance investors see cryptocurrency as an opportunity for diversification and high returns. The growing stability in certain segments, such as crypto ETFs, attracts these investors who seek a blend of risk and innovation.
How did the FTX collapse impact investor sentiment?
The FTX collapse severely damaged trust within the crypto market, leading to significant price drops and an extended period of low market confidence. Traders have since been cautious, affecting overall sentiment.
What trends could drive future crypto market recovery?
Future recovery could be driven by geopolitical stability, clear banking policies, advancements in cryptocurrency infrastructure, and institutional adoption that brings more credibility and security to the market.
You may also like
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?
Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x
Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames
Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun
Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold
Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar
Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?
Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire
Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition
From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash
The Xiaomi electric vehicle factory in Beijing's Daxing district has become the new Jerusalem for the American elite
Lean Harness, Fat Skill: The Real Source of 100x AI Productivity
Ultraman is not afraid of his mansion being attacked; he has a fortress.
US-Iran Negotiations Collapse, Bitcoin Faces Battle to Defend $70,000 Level
Reflections and Confusions of a Crypto VC
1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars
After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?
Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.
App