Successive Core Team "Heroes" Depart, Has Aave's DAO Dream Crumbled?
Original Title: "Key Contributors Successively Leaving, Has Aave's DAO Dream Been Shattered?"
Original Author: Bootly, BitpushNews
On March 3, the Aave protocol's core governance team Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) announced it would shut down operations and leave AAVE.
This is the second major contributor to leave within two weeks—previously on February 20, the development team behind the Aave V3 codebase, BGD Labs, announced their exit.

Following the announcement, the AAVE token price dropped over 11%.
As the most successful DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) in DeFi history, the flagship of DeFi with nearly $27 billion in TVL, is going through a profound internal turmoil.

From Revenue Attribution Dispute to Bundled Voting
The seeds of this crisis were sown as early as December last year.
At that time, Aave Labs, without governance discussion, switched the front-end interface's transaction aggregator from ParaSwap to CoW Swap. Fees that were supposed to go to the DAO treasury now flowed into Aave Labs' account.
Faced with criticism, Aave founder Stani Kulechov's response was: the front-end interface was built by Labs, so the revenue naturally belongs to Labs; only the smart contracts and liquidity pools belong to the DAO. This explanation may hold legally, but it sparked discontent within the community.
To quell the dispute, Aave Labs proposed a proposal called "Aave Will Win" in February this year. The proposal mainly includes: requesting DAO approval for around $51 million to be used for V4 development, in exchange for transferring all future revenue from Aave branded products to the DAO, and establishing Aave V4 as the sole technical foundation, gradually phasing out V3.
The issue is that these three matters were bundled together. Support revenue going to the DAO but think the fund size is too large? No choice. Believe V3 still holds value and should not be sidelined? Equally no choice. It's either all or nothing.
ACI's Grievance: Opaque Voting
In ACI's exit statement, the most crucial allegation is that a significant portion of the support for the proposal came from addresses associated with Aave Labs. The interim check vote only passed with a slim 52.58% majority, and ACI believes the outcome might have been different without these "self-votes."

ACI founder Marc Zeller wrote, "If a major budget recipient can abuse their undisclosed voting power to push through their proposal forcefully, then independent service providers lose their purpose in the DAO."
ACI did not fail to attempt to address the issue. Before the vote, it laid out four conditions, including stricter on-chain milestone tracking, limiting self-voting by budget recipients, etc., but none were adopted.
This conflict reflects structural issues in DAO governance.
Aave Labs holds the codebase, brand domain, social media, and development narrative power. BGD Labs maintains the flagship V3 version—it contributed over 75% of the protocol's revenue and 97% of the total deposits. ACI is responsible for governing coordination and business development, claiming to have driven 61% of governance actions in the past three years, helping increase Aave's DeFi market share from less than 50% to over 65%.
These three teams were supposed to balance each other out. However, with BGD and ACI exiting successively, the remaining power center, no matter how it postures, is hard to trust completely.
In response to ACI's exit announcement, Stani Kulechov stated, "Thank Marc for his contributions over the years; the protocol will continue to operate as normal."

But this response did not address the core issue: when the person most capable of assessing V3's technical risks has exited, how can the DAO confidently bet its future on untested V4?
Another noteworthy detail is that institutional investor Blockchain Capital later revealed that, due to the custody platform not supporting snapshot voting, their held AAVE could not participate. This reveals another reality of DAO governance: while ostensibly decided collectively by token holders, voting power often tends to concentrate in the hands of a few.
DAO Governance Dilemma
ACI indicates that during the next four months of the transition period, governance dashboards, incentive frameworks, committee roles, and other tools and responsibilities will be transferred or open-sourced. However, some things are difficult to transfer: three years of accumulated governance experience, familiarity with protocol details, and the interpersonal network for coordinating different stakeholders.
Data shows that over the past three years, ACI has spent $4.6 million DAO on helping GHO stablecoin grow from $35 million to $527 million. Who will take over this work in the future remains unknown.
The recent turmoil at Aave is essentially a microcosm of the DAO governance dilemma.
In theory, a DAO is a community of token holders. However, in practice, governance is often dominated by the founding team, early investors, and core developers. These roles are both rule-makers and enforcers, and sometimes recipients of the budget. When conflicts of interest arise, whether "procedural justice" is sufficient becomes a contentious issue.
A DeFi practitioner commented, "This is not a matter of right or wrong, but when interests and positions are at odds, the existing governance mechanisms do not provide an effective way to resolve them."
What's next?
The revision of the "Aave Will Win" proposal during the ARFC phase will be the first window to observe the situation's direction. If Kulechov's promised "structural improvements" can be implemented, such as splitting the bundled proposal, clarifying voting behavior boundaries, it may bring this turmoil to a close.
If a consensus cannot be reached, the most extreme possibility is that BGD and ACI will start afresh and fork out a new protocol. Despite the high liquidity barrier, it is not impossible—core developers and governance teams simultaneously exiting provide the technical foundation and community basis for the fork.
For Aave, the immediate issue is how to fill the void left by the departure of two core teams. The longer-term issue is how to find a more sustainable balance between the founder's vision, core developers' interests, and community will. If the paradox of "centralization of power" cannot be resolved, even the strongest protocol may lose its first-mover advantage in endless infighting.
You may also like

Untitled
I’m unable to access the original article content you referenced. Please provide specific details or another article so…

From Utopian Narratives to Financial Infrastructure: The "Disenchantment" and Shift of Crypto VC

A decade-long personal feud, if not for OpenAI's "hypocrisy," there would be no globally leading AI company Anthropic

a16z: The True Meaning of Strong Chain Quality, Block Space Should Not Be Monopolized

a16z: The True Meaning of Strong Chain Quality, Block Space Should Not Be Monopolized

2% user contribution, 90% trading volume: The real picture of Polymarket

Trump Can't Take It Anymore, 5 Signals of the US-Iran Ceasefire

Judge Halts Pentagon's Retaliation Against Anthropic | Rewire News Evening Brief

Midfield Battle of Perp DEX: The Decliners, The Self-Savers, and The Latecomers

Iran War Stalemate: What Signal Should the Market Follow?

Rejecting AI Monopoly Power, Vitalik and Beff Jezos Debate: Accelerator or Brake?

Insider Trading Alert! Will Trump Call a Truce by End of April?

After establishing itself as the top tokenized stock, does Ondo have any new highlights?

BIT Brand Upgrade First Appearance, Hosts "Trust in Digital Finance" Industry Event in Singapore

OpenClaw Founder Interview: Why the US Should Learn from China on AI Implementation
WEEX AI Wars II: Enlist as an AI Agent Arsenal and Lead the Battle
Where the thunder of legions falls into a hallowed hush, the true kings of arena are crowned in gold and etched into eternity. Season 1 of WEEX AI Wars has ended, leaving a battlefield of glory. Millions watched as elite AI strategies clashed, with the fiercest algorithmic warriors dominating the frontlines. The echoes of victory still reverberate. Now, the call to arms sounds once more!
WEEX now summons elite AI Agent platforms to join AI Wars II, launching in May 2026. The battlefield is set, and the next generation of AI traders marches forward—only with your cutting-edge arsenal can they seize victory!
Will you rise to equip the warriors and claim your place among the legends? Can your AI Agent technology dominate the battlefield? It's time to prove it:
Arm the frontlines: Showcase your technology to a global audience;Raise your banner: Gain co-branded global exposure via online competition and offline workshops;Recruit and rally troops: Attract new users, build your community and achieve long-term growth;Deploy in real battle: Integrate with WEEX’s trading system for real market use and get real feedback for rapid product iteration;Strategic rewards: Become an agent on WEEX and enjoy industry leading commission rebates and copy trading profit share.Join WEEX AI Wars II now to sound the charge!
Season 1 Triumph: Proven Global DominanceWEEX AI Wars Season 1 was nothing short of a decisive conquest. Across the digital battlefield, over 2 million spectators bore witness to the clash of elite AI strategies. Tens of thousands of live interactions and more than 50,000 event page visits amplified the reach, giving our sponsors a global stage to showcase their power.
Season 1 unleashed a trading storm of monumental scale, where elite algorithmic warriors clashed, shaping a new era in AI-driven markets. $8 billion in total trading volume, 160,000 battle-tested API calls — we saw one of the most hardcore algorithmic trading armies on the planet, forging an ideal arena for strategy iteration and refinement.
On the ground, workshop campaigns in Dubai, London, Paris, Amsterdam, Munich, and Turkey brought AI trading directly to the frontlines. Sponsors gained offline dominance, connecting with top AI trader units and forming strategic alliances. Livestreams broadcast these battles worldwide, amassing 350,000 views and over 30,000 interactions, huge traffic to our sponsors and partners.
For Season 2, WEEX will expand to even more cities, multiplying opportunities for partners to assert influence and command the battlefield, both online and offline.
Season 2 Arsenal: Equip the Frontlines and Command VictoryBy enlisting in WEEX AI Wars II as an AI Agent arsenal, your platform can command unprecedented visibility, and extend your influence across the world. This is your chance to deploy cutting-edge technology, dominate the competitive frontlines, and reap lasting rewards—GAINING MORE USERS, HIGHER REVENUE, AND LONG-TERM SUPREMACY IN THE AI TRADING ARENA.
Reach WEEX’s 8 million userbase and global crypto community. Unleash your potential on a global stage! This is your ultimate opportunity to skyrocket product visibility and rapidly scale your userbase. Following the explosive success of Season 1—which crushed records with 2 million+ total exposures, your brand is next in line for unparalleled reach and industry-wide impact!Test and showcase your AI Agent in real markets. Throw your AI Agents into the ultimate arena! Empower elite traders to harness your tech through the high-speed WEEX API. This isn't just a demo—it's a live-market battleground to stress-test your algorithms, gather mission-critical feedback, and prove your product's dominance in real-time trading.Gain extensive co-branded exposure and traffic support. Command the spotlight! As a partner, your brand will saturate our entire ecosystem, from viral social media blitzes to global live streams and exclusive offline workshops. We don't just show your logo; we ensure your brand is unstoppable and unforgettable to a massive, global audience.Enjoy industry leading rebates. Becoming our partner is not a one-time collaboration, but the start of a long-term, mutually beneficial relationship with tangible revenue opportunities.Comprehensive growth support: WEEX provides partners with exclusive interviews, joint promotions, and livestream exposure to continuously enhance visibility and engagement.By partnering with WEEX, your platform gains high-quality exposure, more users and sustainable flow of revenue. The Hackathon is more than a competition. It is a platform for innovation, collaboration, and tangible business growth.
Grab Your Second Chance: Join WEEX AI Wars II TodayThe second season of the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon will be even more ambitious and impactful, with expanded global participation, livestreamed competitions, and workshops in more cities worldwide. It offers AI Agent Partners a unique platform to showcase their technology, engage with top developers and traders, and gain global visibility.
We invite forward-thinking partners to join WEEX AI Wars II now, to demonstrate innovation, create lasting impact, foster collaboration, and share in the success of the next generation of AI trading strategies.
About WEEXFounded in 2018, WEEX has developed into a global crypto exchange with over 6.2 million users across more than 150 countries. The platform emphasizes security, liquidity, and usability, providing over 1,200 spot trading pairs and offering up to 400x leverage in crypto futures trading. In addition to the traditional spot and derivatives markets, WEEX is expanding rapidly in the AI era — delivering real-time AI news, empowering users with AI trading tools, and exploring innovative trade-to-earn models that make intelligent trading more accessible to everyone. Its 1,000 BTC Protection Fund further strengthens asset safety and transparency, while features such as copy trading and advanced trading tools allow users to follow professional traders and experience a more efficient, intelligent trading journey.
Follow WEEX on social mediaX: @WEEX_Official
Instagram: @WEEX Exchange
Tiktok: @weex_global
Youtube: @WEEX_Official
Discord: WEEX Community
Telegram: WeexGlobal Group

Nasdaq Enters Correction Territory | Rewire News Morning Brief

OpenAI loses to Thousnad-Question, unable to grow a checkout counter in the chatbox
Untitled
I’m unable to access the original article content you referenced. Please provide specific details or another article so…
