Will the Cryptocurrency Industry Thrive in 2026?
Original Article Title: "Will the Crypto Industry Be Good in 2026?"
Original Article Author: Viee Xiaowei, Biteye
In the last few months of 2025, a bearish atmosphere began to spread.
Bitcoin slipped from its high of $120,000, ETF inflows were temporarily interrupted, various coins showed divergent trends, and meme coins that once ignited emotions also began to be ignored. Unlike the sudden regulatory crackdown seen at the end of 2021, and apart from the major flash crash on 1011, there did not seem to be a severe liquidity crisis, yet something still felt amiss.
If the cryptocurrency world in 2025 was a recalibration of true and false value, will the crypto industry be good in 2026?
This article attempts to find an answer. Perhaps we need to accept a fact: the cryptocurrency industry may be entering an era that no longer relies on unilateral price increases or is primarily driven by a "casino narrative."
1. Macroeconomic Trends Are Improving, Bitcoin Still Riding the Wave
Over the past year, both Bitcoin's price performance and market positioning have undergone significant changes.
After surging to a historic high of $120,000, the market began to decline, volatility increased, and market sentiment gradually cooled. Unlike previous rallies driven by retail investors, the main force behind this rally was institutional funds behind ETFs. From the perspective of average entry price, CryptoQuant analyst Axel Adler Jr. pointed out last month that the average entry price of U.S. ETFs is $79,000, which many consider to be one of the price support zones. Therefore, Bitcoin's current trend is increasingly resembling a high-volatility institutional asset, with a positioning similar to gold's inflation hedge on the one hand and exhibiting beta properties influenced by macro sentiment and risk appetite like tech stocks on the other.
From a broader perspective, 2025 was a year of improved global risk asset sentiment. AI was a major theme, the U.S. stock market continued to hit new highs, and the Federal Reserve announced three interest rate cuts in December, leading the market back into a phase of improving liquidity expectations. The FOMC's year-end economic forecast showed that the expected GDP growth rate for the U.S. in 2026 was revised upward from 1.8% to 2.2–2.5%. There is a general expectation that next year will continue to be accommodative, which may bode well for assets like Bitcoin.
However, the market is not without risks. If the global economy unexpectedly weakens in 2026 or if inflation unexpectedly rebounds, risk assets may still face significant adjustments.
2. Regulatory Turning Point: US and Hong Kong Policy Trends
Another significant change in 2025 was the formalization of regulation.
In the United States, two key bills were passed. The first one was the Stablecoin Act (GENIUS Act), which defined stablecoins, outlined reserve requirements, and set issuance qualification thresholds, providing a compliance pathway for major stablecoin issuers. This act was signed into law by the president in July 2025 and will come into effect 18 months after signing or 120 days after regulatory agencies release final rules. The second one was the Crypto Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act), which systematically delineated the boundaries between "security-type tokens" (regulated by the SEC) and "commodity-type tokens" (regulated by the CFTC) and proposed a tiered regulatory framework. This act is set to be submitted to the Senate in January and may require presidential signature, with the effective date to be determined. Meanwhile, the SEC is accelerating the approval of more crypto ETFs, opening the path for institutional products.
In Hong Kong, regulatory efforts are also ramping up. In 2025, the HKMA introduced a regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers, requiring all Hong Kong-related stablecoin issuers to be licensed. This means that in the future, issuing stablecoins pegged to currencies like the US dollar or Chinese yuan in Hong Kong will require meeting certain capital and compliance requirements. In addition, HashKey has been listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, becoming the first compliant platform with a core business in crypto trading to IPO in Hong Kong, marking a milestone.
Overall, the regulatory trends in the United States and Hong Kong are aimed at not only curbing illegal speculation but also opening up pathways for legal business, driving the industry towards institutionalization and compliance.
3. Stablecoins, Prediction Markets, On-chain Stocks: Three Major Themes
Over the past few years, the most stable growth curve in the crypto industry has actually been stablecoins.
By 2025, the global stablecoin issuance has exceeded $300 billion, with USDT and USDC, the two major stablecoin types, accounting for over 80%. Stablecoins are becoming part of the global payment network, with use cases for USDT and USDC already permeating daily merchant transactions and cross-border settlements.
In 2026, stablecoins are likely to be even closer to the real world. Traditional giants like Visa, Stripe, and PayPal are already settling transactions using stablecoins. For example, Stripe now supports merchants' subscription payments with stablecoins, with real-world services already implemented.

Image Source: a16z
In addition, as regulation becomes clearer, sovereign-backed stablecoins (backed by high-quality assets) are expected to emerge, along with regional stablecoins such as the digital currency bridge projects implemented by Japan and the European Union.
Another aspect worth paying attention to is prediction markets.
Originally, most people considered prediction markets to be niche products or non-compliant. However, now it is evolving into a combination of "on-chain betting + pricing tool" under themes such as the U.S. presidential election, sports matches, and economic data.
For example, Kalshi has obtained an official futures license from the U.S. CFTC, allowing it to legally launch prediction trades related to macroeconomic data. Its current valuation has soared to $11 billion. Meanwhile, Polymarket has become a hub for a large number of users to bet on and gauge public sentiment around topics like the U.S. presidential election and entertainment events.
In 2026, prediction markets may move beyond pure speculation circles. For instance, users may not only bet on outcomes but also use money to vote, expressing their judgment of the probability of a certain result. This collective wisdom pricing method could be used by media, research institutions, and even trading strategies as a reference. Additionally, AI will open up new possibilities for prediction markets, enabling them to not only rely on human bets but also automatically analyze data, place orders, and even create new betting options. This will make prediction markets more responsive and intelligent, gradually transforming them into tools for assessing risk and trends rather than just places for betting on outcomes.
Lastly, the development of tokenized stocks on the blockchain is another undeniable trend.
Simply put, the crypto industry is now not only trading crypto assets but also starting to bring real-world assets onto the blockchain. For example, the company Securitize plans to launch the first fully compliant tokenized stock trading platform in 2026. Tokens purchased on the blockchain represent real company stocks, allowing holders to have voting rights and receive dividends.
IV. Emergent Narratives: New Directions that Might Take Flight in 2026
Meanwhile, some seemingly more fringe directions are also worth noting. The following content is referenced from the article "a16z: 17 Structural Changes in the Crypto Industry."
https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/big-ideas-things-excited-about-crypto-2026/

Image Source: a16z
1. Identity Challenge of AI Agents
As AI agents start engaging in transactions, browsing, placing orders, and even interacting with smart contracts, a key issue arises: how can these non-human identities prove "who they are"?
The concept of "Know Your Agent" (KYA) proposed by a16z aims to address this issue. On-chain, any agent looking to initiate a transaction must have clear permissions and ownership, requiring credentials with encrypted signatures to transact. By 2026, this may become a prerequisite for the widespread deployment of on-chain AI.
2. x402 Protocols and Micropayments
a16z predicts that as AI agents engage in extensive data exchanges, leverage computing power, and interact with APIs, we will enter an era of "automated settlement + programmatic payments."
No longer reliant on manual payments, AI agents can identify needs and autonomously facilitate payments, a reality that protocols like x402 are addressing. In 2026, their presence will become increasingly pronounced.
3. Increased Focus on Privacy Chains
a16z highlights a key trend: compared to performance-driven convergence, privacy will become the core moat of future public blockchains. While in the past, privacy chains were viewed as hindrances to regulation due to their lack of transparency, the tables have turned. Now, the issue is that business data is too sensitive; without privacy protection, regulatory bodies are hesitant to utilize on-chain solutions. Consequently, chains that inherently prioritize privacy are gaining attractiveness. Once users adopt these chains, data remains secure, migration costs increase, and a new form of user stickiness emerges through network effects.
4. Staked Media
In an era where AI generates vast amounts of content, determining the credibility of a statement requires looking not only at who said it but also at the cost associated with making that statement. Therefore, a16z introduces a new media model where content creators not only express opinions but also "stake" their positions through mechanisms such as locking tokens, prediction markets, and NFT credentials.
For example, if you post a bullish view on ETH, you also simultaneously lock up your own ETH as collateral; if you make an election prediction, you also place a bet on the chain. These publicly tied interests will make content more than just lip service. If this gameplay can be successfully implemented, it may become the new norm for on-chain media.
Of course, the directions proposed in the a16z report go far beyond these few examples. This article focuses on four trends that we believe are more representative, while other directions are equally worth paying attention to, such as: stablecoin on/off-ramp upgrades, RWA encryption nativeization, stablecoin-driven upgrade of bank ledger systems, wealth management diversification, the rise of AI research assistants, real-time content sharing mechanism of AI agents, decentralized post-quantum communication, "privacy as a service" becoming infrastructure, DeFi security paradigm shift, intelligent prediction markets, verifiable cloud computing, emphasis on Product-Market Fit (PMF), and crypto regulations unlocking more blockchain potential.
Interested readers can refer to the original a16z report for further in-depth understanding.
5. The Crypto Industry is Breaking Out of its Internal Loop
The early growth of the crypto industry was mostly built within a self-referential system, where coin issuance, referrals, and airdrops all attempted to attract more insiders to stay. However, this closed loop is gradually being broken by reality.
From Polymarket to USDT, and then to the cross-border applications of USDC, we see more and more people who are not Web3 users using blockchain tools. Street vendors in Lagos may not understand wallet structures, but they know that using USDT is much faster than banking transfers. In high inflationary countries, depositors flock to USDC for hedging rather than speculation. One of the most obvious changes is seen in payment scenarios in developing countries, such as the partnership between the trading platform Coins.ph in the Philippines and Circle to open a low-cost USDC remittance channel.
This underlying trend indicates that cryptographic technology is embedding itself in real-world scenarios such as cross-border payments and remittance channels. The true future of crypto may lie in how to use technology to solve real problems and make more ordinary people unconsciously start using blockchain.
6. The Crypto Industry from a KOL Perspective
The recent discussion about whether spending years in the crypto industry is worthwhile is essentially a collective retrospective of the industry.
Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter @nic_carter continued the reflection on "whether spending 8 years in crypto is a waste," admitting that only Bitcoin, stablecoins, DEXs, and prediction markets have truly achieved significant PMF to this day. He chooses to maintain a pragmatic idealism, accepting that bubbles and frenzies are part of the path, not the whole.
Dragonfly Partner Haseeb @hosseeb put it more bluntly, pointing out that the issue is not the existence of the casino, but rather that by only focusing on the glamour of the casino, one would miss the industry's true transformation. He believes that cryptocurrency is a better vessel for finance, one that will forever change the nature of money. He hopes the industry maintains patience: "The Industrial Revolution also took 50 years to change productivity, and we are only 15 years in."
XHunt & Biteye Founder @DeFiTeddy2020's summary is also very realistic. In his view, the crypto industry can quickly expose the essence of finance, facing zeroing projects, detachment of price from fundamentals, and even insider trading, manipulation, and rug pulls. It is not a breeding ground for idealism but a market that educates participants with real money continually, very much toughening the mindset.
Looking ahead to the future direction of the industry, KOL Crypto Goddess @xincctnnq provides a long-term perspective. What cryptocurrency is truly trying to address is the long-term issues of the monetary system, contract execution, digital ownership, capital market efficiency, and financial inclusion. Even if the outcome is distant and the process rough, it is worth constantly trying.
Furthermore, Trader & Analyst @CryptoPainter offers a more market structure-oriented explanation. The crypto market repeats its consistent operational mechanism, "Value Investment" - "Faith Investment" - "Emotional Speculation" - "Utter Disappointment," and then starts over again. This cycle has occurred in 2018, 2022, and is destined to happen again. Gamblers and the casino are not anomalies but rather part of consuming bubbles and completing market self-adjustment.
Figment Capital member DougieDeLuca @DougieDeLuca's position, on the other hand, seems like a phased summary. He bluntly states that "Crypto is dead" does not mean that the price is zero or the blockchain has stopped working. Instead, it means "Crypto as a closed industry form is dying," and true success should be integrating Crypto technology into the everyday lives of ordinary people.
From a more institutional perspective, KOL & Researcher Blue Fox @lanhubiji mentioned that as old users begin to exit, newcomers from traditional finance backgrounds are entering. In their understanding, crypto is a long-term trend that has already entered a path of standardization, interoperability, and scalability. Three years later, a brand-new era of on-chain finance, an on-chain Wall Street era, will gradually emerge.
Meanwhile, LD Capital Founder Jack Yi Hua @Jackyi_ld's assessment is more closely related to the current cycle. He points out that the recent downturn in crypto is more of a temporary resonance of liquidity and macro events. Currently, negative factors are gradually dissipating, and with the dual positive factors of interest rate cuts and crypto-friendly policies, he continues to be optimistic about the subsequent market.
At a more macro level of regulation and industry structure, Hashkey Group Chairman Xiao Feng's judgment is particularly systematic, as he has put forward three major trends for the future:
First, the global trend of crypto regulation is shifting from "voluntary acceptance" to "mandatory compliance," with governments around the world gradually eliminating offshore gray areas and moving crypto transactions towards licensing. For example, in Hong Kong, China, starting from June 2023, all unlicensed trading platforms must exit the market.
Second, crypto is no longer limited to native assets like BTC and ETH; more traditional financial assets are being tokenized and moving onto the blockchain to create a regulated and compliant new tokenized securities market.
Third, from "off-chain" to "on-chain," he predicts that the latter half of 2026 may be a key turning point for the emergence of the "Wall Street on the blockchain."
7. Conclusion
Will crypto be better in 2026?
If you are expecting a "meteoric rise in prices," the answer may be uncertain.
But if you are asking whether this industry is heading towards a more realistic and useful direction, the answer may be affirmative.
From crypto ETFs to stablecoin payments, from on-chain national debts to prediction markets, from on-chain Agents to decentralized AI, all these indicate one thing:
The crypto industry may be starting to land in a more real-world direction, and perhaps it will increasingly resemble a twin financial system running parallel to the real-world financial system, resonating with the stock market, macro liquidity, policy expectations, and even AI cycles.
This article is contributed content and does not represent the views of BlockBeats
You may also like

Found a "meme coin" that skyrocketed in just a few days. Any tips?

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.

Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun

Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold

Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar

Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?

Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire

Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition

From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash

